I really enjoyed these next few sections
of “Tales of Juha.” I felt that these
embodied how humor could be used as a means to make a comment on something that
isn’t socially acceptable. Nowadays, in our society, there are sensitive issues
that we don’t talk about bluntly and I feel that humor can be a way to do so
that would avoid uncomfortable situations. In other words, humor could be an
innuendo technique. Maybe I’m just speculating a little too much but I thought
that the sections on Social Satire
and Naïveté and Stupidity consisted
of jokes that did just that, indirectly commented on unconventional issues
without creating an uncomfortable, awkward atmosphere.
Take for example the Social Satire section in which there were jokes pertaining to
controversial subjects like religion and politics. For example, the following
joke resonated with the idea that people only turn to faith in times of
desperation: One day there was a strong
wind raging. People started praying to God and reciting parts of the Quran.
“All right, all right,” Juha told them. “Don’t be in too much of hurry to
repent. It’s only a storm. It’ll pass.” This idea is commonly seen in life
where people tend to noticeably turn to religion when they are at low times and
take religion or faith for granted at other times. Or it could also people
interpreted that people tend to be to quick to give in in times of desperation,
instead of thinking things through.
There were also multiple anecdotes that
pertained to the recurring theme of being superficial. There was the anecdote
where a man asked Juha, who was wearing a turban and a scholar’s cloak, to read
something for him. He had assumed Juha was able to read just because of Juha’s
attire. There was also an anecdote where Juha attended a banquet in tattered
clothes and then he returned with some fine clothes, and only then was he
respected. By this, he draped his sleeve over his food and called to his sleeve
to eat, suggesting that the other people only cared for his appearance instead
of him as a person. Moreover, there was the anecdote that directly followed,
where Juha, wearing unappealing clothes, went to a public bath and was given
poor service yet he paid a large amount so when he returned, he was treated
with greater service. I thought that these anecdotes commented on the
superficiality of society and this was a common theme throughout. As noted,
this theme wouldn’t be something one would conventionally blurt out in public
as it could be offensive. But by putting it in a joke or anecdote, it could be
lightly brought to attention. This serves as an example of the critical
function, as mentioned as one of the positive effects of laughter in Morreall’s
Comic Relief.
I also found the section on Naïveté and Stupidity interesting
because it highlighted “stupid” character. One joke that really amused me was
the one where Juha’s wife of three months believed that she was pregnant. Juha
had pointed out that it hadn’t been nine months yet his wife still convinced
him that she could be pregnant even though they had only been married for three
months. Another one that amused me was: One
day, Juha was asked about the remedy for a bad eye. “I had a painful toothache
once,” he said. “And the only way I found of easing the pain was to have it
taken out.” These anecdotes, in addition to the others in the same section,
seemed to be a way to make light of people’s misinterpretation. Moreover, this reminded
me of another argument presented in Morreall’s Comic Relief that humor could be used as a means to correct social
behavior. These jokes could be a way of doing just that.
I found that these sections were
exemplar of humor’s greater purpose other than to simply amuse. It has a
purpose to comment on society and other serious issues.
Lizzy,
ReplyDeleteI think you make great points. I agree with you that humor can be a means of pointing out unfortunate or awkward circumstances. Although I'm not an avid fan, I feel like SNL aligns with Tales of Juha on this idea. Thus, I think what you describe is similar to satire. Because the usual goal of satire is social construction, it makes me wonder, if America as a whole was as openly satirical as on SNL (or in Juha), how would the nation change?